Praxis Psy operates with a first filter carried out by the editorial team in which the coherence of the subject matter with the lines proposed by the journal and other aspects such as structure and extension is evaluated. Subsequently, a double-blind peer review is performed, where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewers' reports are anonymous to the authors. Only the editorial team knows the identities and affiliations of the authors of manuscripts before they are published.

Submitted papers will be evaluated by two or more experts, who will be asked to evaluate them through a guideline that contains quality criteria (relevance, coherence, consistency, degree of originality, among others), as well as whether the work is clear enough for publication. In case of major discrepancies between reviewers, we will contact a third reviewer or a member of the editorial team to deliver a final decision.

The editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, when necessary, consult with members of the Editorial Team.

All publications should be subject to this procedure, including manuscripts received for thematic issues.